The Hattiesburg American Editorial, 1/2/9
MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT Justice Oliver Diaz Jr. did not go out with a whisper. He ended his career on the bench with a dissent in the case of Doss vs. State, issued in mid-December, that was a plea to end the death penalty.
Diaz’ argument was primarily a moral one: that society must recognize “even as murderers commit the most cruel and unusual crime, so too do executioners render cruel and unusual punishment.”
Diaz argues that his personal experiences – he was tried and acquitted of bribery while on the Supreme Court – gives him a first-hand view of the “potentially oppressive power of government prosecution.”
About the Author(s)
Magnolia Tribune
This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.
More Like This
More From This Author
Previous Story
Next Story
News
|
Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press
, Humera Lodhi, Associated Press
, Simran Parwani, Associated Press
•
May 6, 2026
Takeaways from Indiana, Ohio and Michigan: Trump’s flex pays off and Democrats win special election
Trump took aim at seven Republican state senators in Indiana who opposed his plan to redraw congressional district boundaries to help the party gain seats in the U.S. House. His intervention mostly paid off.