At this point, the Court concludes that a “no comment” order would be too restrictive. However, an order similar to the one affirmed in Brown is appropriate. Accordingly, attorneys, parties, or witnesses in this case are prohibited from discussing with any public communications media anything about the case which could interfere with a fair trial, including statements intended to influence public opinion regarding the merits of this case, with exceptions for matters of public record and the mere assertion of innocence. Further discussion of evidence subject to motions in limine is prohibited.
About the Author(s)
Magnolia Tribune
This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.
More Like This
More From This Author
Previous Story
News
|
Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press
, Humera Lodhi, Associated Press
, Simran Parwani, Associated Press
•
May 6, 2026
Takeaways from Indiana, Ohio and Michigan: Trump’s flex pays off and Democrats win special election
Trump took aim at seven Republican state senators in Indiana who opposed his plan to redraw congressional district boundaries to help the party gain seats in the U.S. House. His intervention mostly paid off.
