So I’m going to talk about some of the stuff I have in front of me, and ask what ya’ll would like to hear about first.
There’s the transcript linked by Rossmiller, in which Judge DeLaughter suddenly fishtales and rejects the masters ruling. This is a key document in this mess, and involves major stuff I haven’t been able to get to yet (explaining a ruling by federal Judge Lee about why Scruggs might have owed tobacco fees to Wilson) and full of interesting detail (the lawyer talking for Scruggs the whole time in this late 2006 hearing is the one-and-only Tim Balducci, who Scruggs’s current lawyers seem to think hardly know him). I think by having immersed myself in this mess so much I can provide some insight here.
Then there’s the second motion in Eaton Corp. v. Frisby and further explanations about the Peters/Delaughter relationship arrising from that.
And then there’s the seemingly constant steam of news and tips we want to keep ya’ll hearing about.
So. Which should be the focus, first? I think all are worthwhile, and while take seriously a consensus from the Folo community about what ya’ll might want to hear first.
FOLO
1/31/8
Magnolia Tribune
