Skip to content
SH – Warrs face multiple Katrina...

SH – Warrs face multiple Katrina fraud charges

By: Magnolia Tribune - January 29, 2009

Warrs face multiple Katrina fraud charges

The Warrs pleaded innocent to the charges in U.S. District Court this morning. They flanked their attorney, Joe Sam Owen of Gulfport, as they stood before U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Roper.

Gulfport’s first couple potentially faces maximum penalties of 210 years each in prison and fines of up to $4 million each. The government also is seeking forfeiture of their Katrina and insurance funds, or assets of equal value.

Each of them was specifically charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of fraud, four counts of making false statements, three counts of wire fraud and five counts of mail fraud. They were released on unsecured bonds of $25,000 each.

The indictment outlines relief the Warrs received for their beachfront mansion from Sept. 15, 2005, through March 7, 2007. They are charged with conspiring to falsely claim they lived in the beachfront home when they hadn’t actually moved in before the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane.

The Warrs contend they had moved into the beach home before Katrina struck, but they also had stayed at Brent Warr’s deceased grandmother’s home in the Woodglen subdivision while the property they bought in 2003 was renovated.

Prosecutors allege the Warrs fraudulently received the maximum $150,000 HUD homeowners grant through the Mississippi Development Authority, $9,558 in FEMA funds and $88,440.10 from Lexington Insurance Co.

Warr told the media after his court appearance: “Laura and I have entered our plea. It speaks for itself. We are not going to make public statements.” Rather, he said, they plan to defend themselves in court.

Their trial is tentatively scheduled for April 6. Owen told the judge that the Warrs would have separate attorneys by Monday. There is a potential conflict of interest when a couple is represented by the same attorney. The judge pointed out that a plea might be offered to one defendant with less involvement, which an attorney representing both of them could not negotiate.

Sun Herald

About the Author(s)
author profile image

Magnolia Tribune

This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.