A federal appeals court sided with Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. on Thursday in a landmark Hurricane Katrina case.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled that language in the insurer’s storm policy that was used to deny coverage is not “ambiguous.”
“The reason the term ambiguous is important in insurance matters is because ambiguity in insurance contracts is almost universally decided in favor of the policyholder,” said Robert Hartwig, vice president and chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute in New York. “But what the panel is saying here is that it is not ambiguous, that it is quite clear.”
About the Author(s)
Magnolia Tribune
This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.
More Like This
News
|
Lisa Mascaro, Associated Press
, Mary Clare Jalonick, Associated Press
, Leah Askarinam, Associated Press
•
July 3, 2025
House Republicans are pushing Trump’s big bill to the brink of passage
GOP leaders were up all night and the president himself worked to persuade skeptical holdouts to drop their opposition and deliver by their Fourth of July deadline.
More From This Author
Previous Story
Next Story