So I wanted to see what McDaniel had.
But yet, it turns out he had not a damn thing! This regression analysis was not performed by an expert he’d hired, he had pulled it from a weblog story!
I check bylines, but am bad about names. Unlike iddad, in comments on this blog, I failed to note that the author of the analysis (Harry Enten) omitted from the public version of the McDaniel complaint was one of the writers on Nate Silver’s 538 blog!
So the whole basis of McDaniel’s bogus 25,000 vote victory claim is something his lawyers read on the web. And it is an analysis that concludes with a cautionary note:
NMC
8/9/14
About the Author(s)
Magnolia Tribune
This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.
More Like This
News
|
Claudia Lauer, Associate Press
, Amy Taxin, Associated Press
, Alex Veiga, Associated Press
, Deepa Bharath, Associated Press
•
September 6, 2024
A look at the winding legal saga of Hunter Biden that ended in an unexpected guilty plea
A spokesperson for Joe Biden reiterated when asked Thursday that the president had no plans to pardon his son or commute his eventual sentence.
More From This Author
Previous Story