Skip to content
Patsy Brumfield shills for...

Patsy Brumfield shills for “inconclusiveness” of Zach Scruggs’s failed polygraph

By: Magnolia Tribune - November 8, 2010

Late last week, Patsy Brumfield had a quick drive by in her blog to sneak in this little nugget.

A source close to the case says the government has “misrepresented” the results of the polygraphs, and they actually were “inconclusive.”

That’s interesting, but it brings up two more interesting points.

1. If Zach is as innocent as he says he is, why would results be “inconclusive”? Why wouldn’t they be definitive in the way that he didn’t know?

2. Why is that source anonymous? Scruggs inside lawyers have been chewing the ears of friendly reporters seeding doubt in the hopes that it will tip the balance a bit if they can just catch a break.

Like I’ve had the chance to tell thousands of people for Kings of Tort presentations, they won’t ever give up. They don’t think they’ve done anything wrong.

Just wait and watch.

hattip NMC

About the Author(s)
author profile image

Magnolia Tribune

This article was produced by Y'all Politics staff.