Skip to content
AG Fitch joins others to sue Biden...

AG Fitch joins others to sue Biden administration over new guidance to withhold nutrition assistance from schools

By: Sarah Ulmer - July 26, 2022

Attorney General Lynn Fitch

The lawsuit claims the new guidance is based on sex discrimination for schools and programs that receive federal nutrition assistance. 

Attorney General Lynn Fitch and 21 other AG’s across the nation filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against President Biden and his administration. The lawsuit challenges a new guidance geared at withholding federal nutrition assistance from some schools.

The suit was filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Fitch originally joined a coalition of 26 state Attorneys General calling on President Biden to withdraw the USDA’s guidance in June of this year.

“Children and families in need rely on these programs for sustenance,” said Attorney General Lynn Fitch. “This is not the place or time for President Biden to be playing politics and pushing an agenda far out-of-step with the American people.”

On May 5, 2022, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Services issued guidance to Mississippi and other States applying the Administration’s novel reading of discrimination on the basis of sex discrimination into the Food and Nutrition Act. The Administration has sought to apply the Supreme Court’s holding in Bostock v. Clayton County very expansively to include discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity to a wide variety of government programs. The USDA guidance at issue in this case puts Mississippi’s Title IX and SNAP school lunch funding at risk.

The National School Lunch Program services nearly 30 million school children each day, many who rely on it for breakfast, lunch, or both.

The suit argues that the USDA’s guidance is unlawful.

It highlights the following points: 

  • It was issued without providing the States and other stakeholders the opportunity for input as required by the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
  • The USDA premised its Guidance on an obvious misreading and misapplication of the Supreme Court’s holding in Bostock v. Clayton County.
  • The Guidance imposes new and unlawful regulatory measures on state agencies and operators receiving federal financial assistance from the USDA. This will inevitably result in regulatory chaos that threatens essential nutritional services to some of the most vulnerable citizens.

Approximately 100,000 public and non-profit private schools and residential childcare institutions receive federal funding to provide subsidized free or reduced-price meals for qualifying children.

Joining today’s lawsuit, led by Tennessee Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, are the Attorneys General of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Virginia.

Full complaint below: 

Tennessee_ Et Al v. USDA Et Al _Complaint as Filed by yallpolitics on Scribd

About the Author(s)
author profile image

Sarah Ulmer

Sarah is a Mississippi native, born and raised in Madison. She is a graduate of Mississippi State University, where she studied Communications, with an emphasis in Broadcasting and Journalism. Sarah’s experience spans multiple mediums, including extensive videography with both at home and overseas, broadcasting daily news, and hosting a live radio show. In 2017, Sarah became a member of the Capitol Press Corp in Mississippi and has faithfully covered the decisions being made by leaders on some of the most important issues facing our state. Email Sarah: