Skip to content
Home
>
News
>
Stewart case has influenced judicial...

Stewart case has influenced judicial elections and tort debate

By: Magnolia Tribune - March 19, 2009

The Clarion-Ledger Editorial, 3/18/9

Almost a decade ago, Dr. Edsel Stewart, 73, of McComb, thought he had bought some life insurance to protect his children from estate taxes.

Specifically, Stewart thought he bought a $1 million life insurance policy from Prudential Life Insurance for a premium of $105,000 per year. Stewart thought he had given agent James Bateman of JMB Financial Group a check for an initial premium of $20,000 and his completed set of insurance documents on Aug. 31, 1999.

On one of those documents, Stewart wrote: “I believe this contract meets my insurance needs and financial objectives.”

But on Sept. 1, 1999, Dr. Stewart suffered a massive stroke. He lingered in a coma for about seven weeks and then died.

The Stewart family tried to collect on the policy, but Prudential balked – claiming that the $20,000 payment to Bateman was not a premium payment but a fee for estate planning. The company further argued that the policy had not been finalized.

Finally, the company argued that the policy Bateman gave Stewart was not the actual policy, but a counter offer.

Litigation ensued.

About the Author(s)
author profile image

Magnolia Tribune

This article was produced by Magnolia Tribune staff.
Previous Story
Next Story